Skip to content

Cronofy: Advanced Calendar API Integration for Applications

This analytical report deeply examines Cronofy’s business model, value proposition, and target market. Through systematic evaluation, we explore how this calendar API integration service creates value for developers and businesses while achieving sustainable growth in the competitive API ecosystem.

SaaSbm benchmark report

  • Company : Cronofy Ltd
  • Brand : Cronofy
  • Homepage : https://www.cronofy.com
  • Problem:Businesses struggle with integrating scheduling capabilities across multiple calendar platforms (Google, Microsoft, Apple) into their applications.
  • Solution:Cronofy provides a unified API that seamlessly connects to all major calendar providers, enabling scheduling automation and calendar synchronization in any application.
  • Problem:Cronofy offers enterprise-grade security, real-time synchronization, and comprehensive scheduling tools while supporting all major calendar services through a single API integration.
  • Solution:
    Software developers, enterprises, and SaaS companies that need to embed scheduling functionality into their applications or streamline appointment booking processes.
  • Business Model:Cronofy operates on a tiered subscription model based on usage volume and required features, with specialized enterprise pricing for large-scale implementations.

[swpm_protected for=”4″ custom_msg=’This report is available to Harvest members. Log in to read.‘]

1. Service Overview

This section analyzes Cronofy’s basic information, core functionality, value proposition, and target customers. Starting with service definition and classification, we examine the main problems this service solves, its differentiating elements, and thoroughly analyze the connection between customer needs and service value.

1.1 Service Definition

Cronofy provides a unified calendar API that enables seamless integration of scheduling functionality across multiple calendar systems, serving as a critical infrastructure component for software developers and businesses.

  • Service Category: API-as-a-Service (APIaaS) / Calendar Infrastructure
  • Core Functionality: A unified API that enables applications to read, write, and synchronize calendar data across major calendar providers including Google Calendar, Microsoft Office 365, Apple iCloud, and Exchange.
  • Established: 2014
  • Service Description: Cronofy acts as a middleware layer that normalizes disparate calendar systems into a single, consistent API interface. The service handles complex synchronization issues, security requirements, and authentication processes across calendar platforms. It enables businesses to build scheduling capabilities into their applications without managing the complexities of multiple calendar systems. Cronofy also provides pre-built UI components and specialized scheduling solutions for specific industries like recruitment, field service management, and enterprise scheduling.

1.2 Value Proposition Analysis

Cronofy delivers substantial value by solving complex scheduling and calendar integration challenges that would otherwise require significant development resources and ongoing maintenance.

  • Core Value Proposition: Eliminates the technical complexity and maintenance burden of integrating with multiple calendar systems, allowing businesses to build robust scheduling functionality into their applications faster and more reliably.
  • Primary Target Customers: Software development teams, SaaS companies, enterprises with custom applications, recruitment platforms, field service management solutions, and businesses that require scheduling as part of their workflow.
  • Differentiation Points: Enterprise-grade security and compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, etc.), comprehensive coverage across all major calendar providers, specialized vertical solutions (like Smart Invites and Availability API), and developer-friendly tools including extensive documentation, SDKs, and pre-built UI components.

1.3 Value Proposition Canvas Analysis

SaaSbm VPC

The Value Proposition Canvas systematically analyzes customer needs, challenges, and expected gains, mapping how Cronofy’s features address these elements.

Customer Jobs
  • Integrating calendar functionality into applications
  • Building reliable scheduling features for users
  • Managing availability across teams/organizations
  • Ensuring calendar data synchronizes correctly
Customer Pain Points
  • Managing multiple calendar API integrations
  • Dealing with inconsistent data formats between providers
  • Handling authentication and security requirements
  • Maintaining integrations as calendar providers change
Customer Gains
  • Faster time-to-market for scheduling features
  • Reduced development and maintenance costs
  • Enhanced reliability of scheduling functionality
  • Ability to focus on core product development
Service Value Mapping

Cronofy directly addresses pain points through its unified API approach. Its normalization layer eliminates the need to handle disparate calendar formats, while built-in authentication workflows solve security challenges. The service’s continuous updates ensure compatibility with changing calendar providers, reducing maintenance burden. The specialized components like Availability API directly support scheduling workflow jobs, while the advanced security features satisfy enterprise requirements. This comprehensive coverage transforms what would be a complex, resource-intensive development project into a straightforward API integration, allowing development teams to deliver robust scheduling capabilities with significantly less effort.

1.4 Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework identifies the fundamental reasons customers “hire” Cronofy, along with the contexts and success criteria for these jobs.

Core Job

Companies hire Cronofy to integrate reliable, cross-platform scheduling capabilities into their applications without diverting engineering resources to building and maintaining calendar integrations. This job combines functional needs (working calendar synchronization) with emotional aspects (confidence that scheduling will work consistently and securely across all calendar systems without becoming a maintenance burden).

Job Context

This job arises when companies recognize scheduling as critical to their application but not their core competency. The frequency is ongoing (continuous integration and synchronization), and importance is high – scheduling failures directly impact user experience and potentially business operations. The job becomes particularly acute when companies need to support multiple calendar systems, enterprise security requirements, or specialized scheduling workflows.

Success Criteria

Customers evaluate success based on reliability (calendar events correctly synchronized across systems), comprehensiveness (support for all required calendar providers), performance (minimal latency), security compliance, ease of implementation, and reduced developer time compared to building in-house. Additionally, the solution must handle edge cases like time zone management, recurring events, and graceful handling of provider-specific limitations.

2. Market Analysis

This section analyzes the market in which Cronofy operates, examining competitive dynamics and positioning. We identify the maturity and trends in Cronofy’s market segment, evaluate its positioning relative to key competitors, and identify differentiating elements and opportunities within the market.

2.1 Market Positioning

Cronofy occupies a specialized position in the broader API economy, focusing specifically on calendar infrastructure and scheduling solutions.

  • Service Category: Enterprise Calendar Infrastructure and Scheduling API Services
  • Market Maturity: Growth stage – The API economy is well-established, but specialized verticalized API services like calendar infrastructure continue to see expanding adoption as more businesses recognize the value of outsourcing non-core technical challenges.
  • Market Trend Relevance: Strongly aligned with several key trends: (1) The accelerating API economy where businesses leverage specialized infrastructure APIs rather than building everything in-house, (2) Digital transformation requiring scheduling and calendar functionality across diverse applications, (3) Growing demand for cross-platform interoperability, and (4) Increasing focus on specialized vertical SaaS solutions that require scheduling components.

2.2 Competitive Environment

Cronofy operates in a specialized market with focused competition and potential alternatives that address similar scheduling challenges.

  • Key Competitors: Nylas (calendar API as part of broader communication APIs), Timekit (scheduling infrastructure), Microsoft Graph API (for Microsoft calendar ecosystem), CalendarAPI (calendar integration service), and specialized scheduling tools like Calendly (though with a different focus)
  • Competitive Landscape: The calendar API integration market is relatively concentrated with few specialized players. Most competitors either focus on broader communication APIs (not just calendar) or on end-user scheduling rather than developer infrastructure. Cronofy’s specialized focus on calendar-specific infrastructure across all major providers gives it a unique position.
  • Substitutes: In-house developed calendar integrations, direct integration with specific calendar providers (limiting cross-platform support), scheduling software with built-in calendar features (not API-based), and manual scheduling processes (for smaller operations).

2.3 Competitive Positioning Analysis

SaaSbm VPC

This analysis maps Cronofy’s position relative to competitors based on key differentiating factors in the calendar API and scheduling infrastructure market.

Competitive Positioning Map

The competitive landscape can be visualized along two critical dimensions that determine positioning in the calendar integration and scheduling infrastructure space.

  • X-axis: Solution Scope (Focused Calendar API to Broad Communication APIs)
  • Y-axis: Implementation Level (Developer Infrastructure to End-User Solution)
Positioning Analysis

Mapping key players on these dimensions reveals distinct strategic approaches:

  • Nylas: Positioned in the upper-right quadrant, offering broader communication APIs (email, calendar, contacts) primarily as developer infrastructure but with some pre-built components moving toward end-user solutions.
  • Microsoft Graph API: Positioned in the mid-right, providing broad communication APIs but limited to the Microsoft ecosystem, primarily as developer infrastructure.
  • Calendly: Positioned in the upper-left, focused specifically on scheduling but as an end-user solution rather than developer infrastructure.
  • Timekit: Positioned slightly left of center on the lower half, offering scheduling infrastructure with some broader workflow capabilities but primarily as developer tools.
  • Cronofy: Positioned in the lower-left quadrant, with a highly focused specialization in calendar infrastructure specifically for developers. This positioning allows Cronofy to offer deeper calendar functionality and cross-provider support than broader API providers, while maintaining flexibility for developers compared to end-user solutions. Its particular strength lies in providing both low-level API access and specialized components for specific scheduling needs, setting it apart from competitors who typically emphasize one approach over the other.

3. Business Model Analysis

This section provides an in-depth analysis of Cronofy’s business model structure and monetization strategy. We systematically examine revenue generation methods, customer acquisition strategies, and the key components of Cronofy’s SaaS business model, evaluating its sustainability and scalability.

3.1 Revenue Model

Cronofy employs a tiered subscription model with usage-based components, carefully structured to align with the value delivered to different customer segments.

  • Revenue Structure: Subscription-based with usage tiers and enterprise licensing – combining elements of both SaaS and API-as-a-Service business models.
  • Pricing Strategy: Multi-tiered approach with Free, Pro, Enterprise, and custom pricing levels. Pricing is primarily based on API usage volume (calendar operations), number of connected users, and access to premium features. Enterprise tiers include custom contracts with volume discounts and additional support services.
  • Free Tier Scope: Cronofy offers a free developer tier allowing limited API calls and connected users (typically sufficient for development and testing). This freemium approach enables developers to build and test integrations before committing to paid plans when moving to production environments. The free tier includes core API functionality but limits volume and excludes certain advanced features like enterprise security controls and dedicated support.

3.2 Customer Acquisition Strategy

Cronofy employs a developer-first acquisition strategy combined with specialized vertical marketing to attract and convert both technical implementers and business decision-makers.

  • Key Acquisition Channels: Developer-focused content marketing (technical blogs, documentation, GitHub presence), SEO targeting technical integration searches, developer conferences and events, partner integrations with complementary platforms, and targeted outreach to vertical industries like recruitment and field service management.
  • Sales Model: Hybrid approach combining self-service for smaller implementations with inside sales for enterprise customers. Smaller developers and companies can sign up and implement directly through the website, while larger enterprise customers receive personalized sales support and custom implementation guidance.
  • User Onboarding: Developer-centric onboarding with comprehensive documentation, quick-start guides, SDKs for multiple programming languages, interactive API explorers, and code samples for common use cases. For enterprise customers, Cronofy offers additional implementation support and integration consulting to ensure successful adoption.

3.3 SaaS Business Model Canvas

SaaSbm BMC

The Business Model Canvas framework provides a systematic analysis of Cronofy’s overall business structure.

Value Proposition

Unified calendar API that simplifies complex scheduling challenges across multiple calendar systems, reducing development time and maintenance costs.

Customer Segments

Software developers, SaaS companies, enterprises with custom applications, and specific verticals (recruitment, field service management, etc.) requiring scheduling functionality.

Channels

Direct website, developer portals, technical documentation, partner integrations, conferences, and enterprise sales team.

Customer Relationships

Self-service developer portal, technical support, account managers for enterprise clients, and developer community engagement.

Revenue Streams

Tiered subscription model based on API usage volume, connected users, and premium features; custom enterprise contracts.

Key Resources

API infrastructure, calendar synchronization technology, security compliance systems, developer relations team, and specialized industry knowledge.

Key Activities

API development and maintenance, platform security, integration with calendar providers, technical documentation, customer support, and continuous monitoring.

Key Partnerships

Calendar providers (Google, Microsoft, Apple), complementary API services, industry-specific platforms, cloud infrastructure providers.

Cost Structure

Engineering team, API infrastructure hosting, security compliance, customer support, sales and marketing, and ongoing calendar provider integration maintenance.

Business Model Analysis

Cronofy’s business model demonstrates substantial strengths in its focused approach to solving a specific, complex technical challenge for developers. The tiered pricing aligns well with customer value realization, allowing customers to start small and grow usage as their applications scale. The developer-centric approach creates a strong technical moat around their service, while partnerships with calendar providers ensure ongoing compatibility. The primary weakness lies in potential dependency on major calendar providers’ APIs, which could change policies. However, this risk is mitigated by Cronofy’s diversification across multiple providers and specialized knowledge that allows quick adaptation. The subscription-based model with both usage-based components and enterprise contracts creates predictable revenue with growth potential, while the technical nature of the service and high switching costs once integrated promote strong customer retention, enhancing overall business sustainability.

4. Product Analysis

This section conducts an in-depth analysis of Cronofy’s product aspects. We examine core features and user experience, mapping how these features deliver value to customers. This helps identify the product’s strengths, differentiating elements, and potential areas for improvement.

4.1 Core Feature Analysis

Cronofy offers a comprehensive set of calendar-related capabilities organized into distinct functional categories, with several standout features that differentiate it from competitors.

  • Major Feature Categories: Calendar Access APIs (read/write/sync), Availability API, Scheduling APIs, Real-Time Scheduling, Enterprise Security Controls, UI Elements, and Vertical-Specific Solutions
  • Key Differentiating Features: Cross-calendar availability determination, enterprise-grade security controls, two-way real-time synchronization, scheduling UI components that work across calendar systems, and specialized vertical solutions like Smart Invites (for recruitment)
  • Functional Completeness: Exceptionally high compared to competitors – Cronofy offers the most comprehensive set of calendar integration capabilities across all major providers. While some competitors may offer deeper features in specific calendar systems (e.g., Microsoft Graph for Outlook), none match Cronofy’s breadth across systems combined with specialized scheduling functionality.

Cronofy’s core strength lies in its abstraction layer that handles the complexities of calendar integration behind a clean, consistent API. For example, its Availability API can determine free/busy times across multiple users’ calendars from different providers – a task that would normally require complex synchronization logic. This approach greatly simplifies development while ensuring reliable performance across calendar systems. The company has also invested in vertical-specific solutions that address unique scheduling challenges in industries like recruitment, where its Smart Invites feature handles the complex coordination between candidates, interviewers, and rooms/resources.

4.2 User Experience

Cronofy focuses on delivering an excellent developer experience while also providing components that enhance end-user scheduling interactions.

  • UI/UX Characteristics: Clean, developer-oriented interfaces for implementation and management; extensive documentation with interactive examples; pre-built UI components that can be customized to match client branding; and real-time scheduling interfaces for end-users that provide a seamless experience across calendar systems.
  • User Journey: For developers: registration → API key generation → documentation exploration → SDK/library integration → testing with sample code → production implementation → monitoring and management. For end-users interacting with Cronofy-powered applications: calendar authorization → availability sharing → scheduling/booking interactions → real-time calendar updates.
  • Accessibility and Usability: Developer tools feature comprehensive documentation with language-specific examples, reducing implementation complexity. For end-users, the pre-built components follow accessibility standards and responsive design principles, though customization responsibility ultimately falls to the implementing developer.

Cronofy has invested heavily in creating a developer-friendly experience with extensive documentation, comprehensive SDKs for popular programming languages (JavaScript, Ruby, PHP, .NET, Python), and interactive API explorers. The developer dashboard provides clear usage metrics and debugging tools, helping developers manage their integration effectively. For end-users, the Real-Time Scheduling UI components deliver a polished scheduling experience that handles complex scenarios like time zone detection, recurring availability, and buffer times between meetings. These components can be embedded directly into applications or used as standalone scheduling pages, giving developers flexibility in implementation.

4.3 Feature-Value Mapping Analysis

This analysis maps Cronofy’s key features to specific customer value and assesses their differentiation level compared to competitors.

Core Feature Customer Value Differentiation Level
Unified Calendar API Eliminates need to maintain multiple calendar integrations; provides consistent interface across all major calendar systems Medium
Availability API Simplifies complex availability determination across multiple users and calendar systems; enables efficient scheduling without double-booking High
Real-Time Scheduling Delivers immediate updates across systems; ensures scheduling accuracy and reduces missed appointments High
Enterprise Security Controls Meets compliance requirements (SOC 2, GDPR, etc.); provides enterprise-grade security without additional development High
Pre-built UI Components Accelerates development of user-facing scheduling interfaces; ensures consistent experience across platforms Medium
Mapping Analysis

The feature-value mapping reveals Cronofy’s strategic focus on high-value, complex calendar integration challenges. The Unified Calendar API provides essential cross-system compatibility but faces some competition from broader API providers. However, Cronofy achieves significant differentiation through its specialized features like the Availability API and Real-Time Scheduling, which directly address complex scheduling workflows that would otherwise require substantial custom development. The Enterprise Security Controls represent another strong differentiator, particularly valuable for organizations with strict compliance requirements. The pre-built UI components deliver substantial time-to-market advantages but face moderate competition from specialized scheduling tools. Cronofy’s competitive advantage is strongest where calendar functionality intersects with complex business workflows and enterprise requirements – precisely the high-value, difficult-to-replicate areas of the market. Future enhancement opportunities exist in deeper industry-specific workflow integrations and expanded analytics capabilities around scheduling optimization.

5. Growth Strategy Analysis

This section analyzes Cronofy’s current growth stage and future expansion potential. We assess its current growth state, explore various expansion opportunities in product and market dimensions, and outline effective growth paths.

5.1 Current Growth State

Cronofy has established a strong foundation in the calendar API space and appears to be in an active growth phase with multiple expansion vectors.

  • Growth Stage: Growth/Expansion phase – having established product-market fit in the developer tools and scheduling infrastructure space, Cronofy is now expanding both its core capabilities and its reach into specialized vertical markets.
  • Expansion Directions: Cronofy is pursuing multiple expansion paths: deeper functionality in its core calendar infrastructure, broader reach into vertical-specific solutions, geographic expansion, and moving up-market toward larger enterprise deployments.
  • Growth Drivers: Key drivers include the increasing demand for sophisticated scheduling capabilities across industries, the growing API economy encouraging businesses to use specialized infrastructure services rather than building in-house, digital transformation initiatives requiring scheduling components, and the expansion of remote/hybrid work creating new scheduling challenges.

Cronofy’s growth is fundamentally supported by its strategic position at the intersection of critical market trends. The calendar infrastructure space represents a technically complex but ubiquitously needed functionality – an ideal combination for an API-as-a-Service business. The company appears to be leveraging its core expertise in calendar synchronization to expand both horizontally (into more use cases across different industries) and vertically (deeper features for specific industries like recruitment). Their progressive move toward enterprise customers indicates maturation of both product capabilities and go-to-market strategy, with security certifications and compliance features supporting this upmarket movement. The company’s expansion of pre-built components alongside its core API demonstrates a sophistication in understanding that different customer segments have varying needs for customization versus out-of-the-box functionality.

5.2 Expansion Opportunities

Cronofy has multiple potential expansion vectors across product, market, and revenue dimensions.

  • Product Expansion Opportunities: Expanding scheduling intelligence features (AI-based optimal time suggestions, meeting efficiency analysis), broader workflow integrations beyond calendars (tasks, project management, communications), more sophisticated resource scheduling capabilities (equipment, rooms, etc.), and expanded UI component library for faster implementation.
  • Market Expansion Opportunities: Deeper penetration in high-value verticals (healthcare scheduling, education, professional services), geographic expansion focusing on regions with high digital transformation activity, SMB-focused simplified solutions that require minimal development expertise, and strategic partnerships with complementary API providers.
  • Revenue Expansion Opportunities: Value-based pricing for specialized vertical solutions, premium support and professional services for complex implementations, marketplace or platform for scheduling-related add-ons, and white-label solutions for specific industries.

Cronofy’s position as a specialized API provider creates several compelling expansion paths. In product terms, the company can leverage its deep understanding of calendar systems to build increasingly intelligent scheduling capabilities – moving from simple availability determination to optimized scheduling that considers factors like participant preferences, travel time, and meeting objectives. The vertical-specific solutions represent particularly promising opportunities, as they allow Cronofy to deliver higher value (and potentially command higher prices) by addressing industry-specific scheduling challenges. For example, in healthcare, scheduling must consider factors like provider credentials, equipment availability, and patient history – complex requirements that generic scheduling tools handle poorly. For market expansion, Cronofy can develop simplified versions of its tools for smaller businesses that need scheduling capabilities but lack dedicated development resources. From a revenue perspective, the specialized vertical solutions represent the most promising path to higher-value offerings, potentially shifting from pure usage-based pricing toward outcomes-based models in high-value industries.

5.3 SaaS Expansion Matrix

The SaaS Expansion Matrix systematically analyzes Cronofy’s growth paths and identifies priority directions.

Vertical Expansion (Vertical Expansion)

Definition: Providing deeper value to the same customer base

Potential: High

Strategy: Enhance core calendar infrastructure with more intelligent scheduling capabilities, advanced analytics and optimization features, deeper integration options, and premium enterprise features. Develop more sophisticated versions of existing tools that solve increasingly complex scheduling challenges for current users.

Horizontal Expansion (Horizontal Expansion)

Definition: Expanding to similar customer segments

Potential: Medium

Strategy: Extend beyond pure calendar functionality into adjacent areas like resource management, meeting productivity tools, and attendance tracking. Target development teams in companies adjacent to current customers, focusing on those with similar technical requirements but in different industries.

New Market Expansion (New Market Expansion)

Definition: Expanding to new customer segments

Potential: Medium-High

Strategy: Develop specialized, vertical-specific solutions for industries with complex scheduling requirements (healthcare, education, financial services). Create simplified implementations requiring minimal development expertise to address the SMB market. Pursue geographic expansion, particularly in regions with strong digital transformation initiatives.

Expansion Priority

Based on Cronofy’s position and capabilities, the most promising expansion directions are:

  1. Vertical-Specific Solutions Development (New Market Expansion) – Creating specialized scheduling solutions for high-value industries like healthcare represents the highest potential reward, leveraging Cronofy’s core expertise while addressing underserved markets with complex scheduling needs.
  2. Scheduling Intelligence Enhancement (Vertical Expansion) – Adding AI-powered optimization, analytics, and recommendation capabilities to the core platform strengthens Cronofy’s value proposition to existing customers while creating defensibility against potential competitors.
  3. Simplified Implementation Tools (New Market Expansion) – Developing lower-code or no-code solutions for the SMB market opens a large potential customer base that needs scheduling capabilities but lacks dedicated development resources.

6. SaaS Success Factors Analysis

This section analyzes the key factors determining Cronofy’s long-term success potential. We evaluate product-market fit, key SaaS metrics, and main business metrics to comprehensively diagnose the service’s current state and future potential.

6.1 Product-Market Fit

This analysis evaluates how well Cronofy’s solution aligns with market needs across multiple dimensions.

  • Problem-Solution Fit: Extremely strong – Calendar integration represents a significant technical challenge that most businesses need but prefer not to dedicate resources to building. Cronofy solves this problem comprehensively with a solution that handles complexity while providing flexibility. The problem is both ubiquitous and difficult enough to justify outsourcing to a specialized provider.
  • Target Market Fit: Strong – Cronofy has selected appropriate market segments that balance technical sophistication (ability to implement APIs) with business need (requiring scheduling functionality but not wanting to build it). Their segmentation into vertical-specific solutions demonstrates sophisticated understanding of different market requirements.
  • Market Timing: Favorable – Cronofy entered when API-driven development was becoming mainstream but before the calendar infrastructure space was crowded. The increasing focus on digital transformation and remote/hybrid work has amplified the need for sophisticated scheduling tools, creating tailwinds for adoption.

Cronofy demonstrates excellent product-market fit by addressing a persistent technical challenge that exists across many businesses but isn’t typically part of their core competency. Calendar integration represents the ideal problem for an API solution: complex enough to be painful to build in-house, universal enough to support a dedicated service, and specialized enough to benefit from focused expertise. Cronofy’s progressive expansion from pure API to more specialized solutions and pre-built components shows a sophisticated understanding of different market segments’ needs. For developers needing maximum customization, the raw API provides flexibility, while businesses needing faster implementation can leverage pre-built UI components. Their entry timing allowed them to establish a strong position before competition intensified, and ongoing digital transformation trends continue to expand their potential market. The strongest evidence of product-market fit is their successful expansion into enterprise customers, which typically have the resources to build solutions in-house but still choose Cronofy – indicating the solution delivers substantial value over internal development.

6.2 SaaS Key Metrics Analysis

This analysis examines the key operational metrics that determine success for Cronofy’s SaaS business.

  • Customer Acquisition Efficiency: Cronofy’s developer-first approach appears efficient for its target market. The freemium model with self-service for smaller implementations reduces CAC for the long tail of customers, while more resource-intensive sales processes are reserved for enterprise prospects with higher lifetime value. The technical nature of the product means acquisition focuses on developer channels rather than broader but less targeted marketing.
  • Customer Retention Factors: Cronofy benefits from strong stickiness due to several factors: technical integration that creates switching costs, mission-critical functionality that becomes embedded in customers’ applications, network effects as users connect their calendars to applications using Cronofy, and continuous improvements that provide ongoing value. The service’s reliability is particularly crucial for retention, as calendar functionality is typically expected to work flawlessly.
  • Revenue Expansion Potential: Strong upsell and cross-sell opportunities exist through natural usage growth (as customer applications scale), additional feature adoption (enterprise security, specialized APIs), and expansion to more users or calendar operations. The vertical-specific solutions provide higher-value cross-sell opportunities to existing customers who need specialized functionality.

Cronofy’s operational metrics reflect the strengths of infrastructure API businesses. Unlike end-user SaaS, API businesses typically see fewer but higher-value customers with stronger retention. The developer acquisition model creates efficiencies by targeting technical decision-makers directly through appropriate channels like GitHub, technical content, and developer events. Once integrated, Cronofy becomes deeply embedded in customers’ applications, creating significant switching costs that support high retention rates. As customers’ applications grow in users or functionality, Cronofy naturally captures more revenue through its usage-based components. The business model is inherently scalable, as incremental costs to serve additional API calls are relatively low once the infrastructure is established. The vertical-specific solutions represent important revenue expansion opportunities, allowing Cronofy to capture more value from existing customers by solving increasingly complex (and valuable) scheduling problems.

6.3 SaaS Metrics Evaluation

SaaSbm Metrics Evaluation

This analysis estimates and evaluates key SaaS business metrics to assess Cronofy’s economic health.

Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)

Estimate: Medium

Rationale: Cronofy’s developer-focused marketing requires specialized technical content and developer relations, which is resource-intensive. However, the self-service model for smaller customers and efficient developer targeting help control costs. Enterprise customer acquisition likely involves longer sales cycles and higher touch, increasing CAC for that segment.

Industry Comparison: Likely better than average for developer tools/API services – the technical focus allows for more efficient targeting compared to broader SaaS products.

Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)

Estimate: High

Rationale: Once integrated, Cronofy becomes a critical infrastructure component with high switching costs. Usage-based pricing captures value as customer applications grow. Enterprise customers likely represent particularly high LTV due to larger deployments and additional security/support needs.

Industry Comparison: Likely higher than average for SaaS businesses, as infrastructure API services typically enjoy longer customer lifetimes and growing usage over time.

Churn Rate

Estimate: Low

Rationale: High switching costs after integration, mission-critical functionality, and continuous improvement of the service all contribute to low expected churn. Technical integration creates both practical and psychological barriers to switching providers.

Industry Comparison: Better than SaaS industry averages – infrastructure services typically see lower churn than application-level SaaS due to deeper integration and switching difficulties.

LTV:CAC Ratio

Estimate: 4:1 or higher

Economic Analysis: Cronofy’s business model likely demonstrates strong economic sustainability. The combination of relatively contained CAC (through efficient developer targeting) and high LTV (through strong retention and expanding usage) creates favorable unit economics. The self-service model for smaller customers helps keep acquisition costs low for that segment while enterprise sales efforts are justified by much higher lifetime value.

Improvement Opportunities: Further enhancing LTV:CAC through vertical-specific solutions that command premium pricing, streamlining enterprise onboarding to reduce time-to-value, and developing more self-service resources for mid-market customers to reduce sales touch requirements.

7. Risk and Opportunity Analysis

This section analyzes the key risk factors facing Cronofy and the growth opportunities it can leverage. We identify and assess risks related to market changes, competitive environment, and business model, while also exploring short-term and long-term growth opportunities and providing strategic direction through SWOT analysis.

7.1 Key Risks

Cronofy faces several significant risk factors that could impact its business trajectory and market position.

  • Market Risks: Calendar API integration is becoming increasingly commoditized as major calendar providers like Google, Microsoft, and Apple continue to improve their native APIs. Changing API policies from these major calendar services could disrupt Cronofy’s business model if they restrict third-party access or introduce competing features. Additionally, the shift toward remote and hybrid work models may evolve differently than anticipated, potentially changing market requirements for scheduling solutions.
  • Competitive Risks: Larger tech companies might enter the calendar synchronization space directly, leveraging their existing infrastructure and customer base. Emerging startups focusing on specific verticals or use cases could capture niche markets with tailored solutions that outperform Cronofy in specialized scenarios. Price competition may intensify as the market matures, potentially squeezing margins.
  • Business Model Risks: Cronofy’s API-first approach creates dependency on developers and technical decision-makers, which can lengthen sales cycles and make revenue forecasting challenging. The tiered subscription model may face pressure if competitors offer more flexible or lower-cost alternatives. Lastly, data privacy concerns and regulatory changes could increase compliance costs and restrict how calendar data is accessed and utilized.

The most significant long-term risk to Cronofy is the potential for calendar ecosystem owners (Google, Microsoft, Apple) to either significantly enhance their own synchronization capabilities or restrict API access, which would undermine Cronofy’s core value proposition. This could force a substantial pivot or realignment of their service offerings. Additionally, the increasing focus on data privacy globally may lead to more stringent regulations that could complicate Cronofy’s ability to access and synchronize calendar data across different platforms, potentially affecting their core functionality.

7.2 Growth Opportunities

Despite the risks, Cronofy has several promising opportunities for growth at different time horizons.

  • Short-term Opportunities: Expanding integrations with popular business tools beyond current partnerships would increase Cronofy’s utility and stickiness. Development of industry-specific solutions for sectors with complex scheduling needs (healthcare, education, professional services) could open new revenue streams. Implementing AI-powered scheduling optimization features would enhance value proposition and potentially justify premium pricing tiers.
  • Medium to Long-term Opportunities: Creating an end-to-end scheduling ecosystem that extends beyond calendar synchronization to include meeting management, follow-up automation, and analytics could significantly expand Cronofy’s footprint. Expanding into adjacent markets such as time management, productivity tracking, or workforce management tools would leverage Cronofy’s calendar expertise. International expansion with localized solutions for markets with different scheduling conventions and calendar systems represents another growth vector.
  • Differentiation Opportunities: Developing proprietary scheduling intelligence that learns from patterns and optimizes calendar management automatically would create strong differentiation. Focusing on high-security, compliance-first solutions for regulated industries (finance, healthcare, government) could create a defensible niche. Building the most comprehensive cross-platform calendar solution with the broadest range of supported services would reinforce Cronofy’s market leadership.

The most promising immediate opportunity for Cronofy appears to be the development of industry-vertical solutions that address the unique scheduling challenges of specific sectors. By creating specialized offerings for industries like healthcare (patient scheduling while respecting provider preferences), education (complex academic scheduling with multiple constraints), or professional services (client meeting coordination across time zones), Cronofy could increase both customer acquisition and average revenue per customer. This approach would allow them to move up-market while strengthening barriers to entry against potential competitors who lack the industry-specific expertise.

7.3 SWOT Analysis

SaaSbm SWOT

A systematic SWOT analysis provides a comprehensive view of Cronofy’s internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats.

Strengths
  • Unified API that simplifies integration across multiple calendar systems (Google, Microsoft, Apple)
  • Strong focus on security and compliance, including GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001
  • Robust developer experience with comprehensive documentation and support
  • Specialized scheduling expertise and deep understanding of calendar system complexities
Weaknesses
  • Dependency on third-party calendar providers and their API policies
  • Limited brand recognition compared to major tech platforms
  • Developer-centric approach may limit appeal to non-technical decision makers
  • Relatively narrow focus compared to broader productivity suites
Opportunities
  • Growing demand for scheduling automation in hybrid and remote work environments
  • Expansion into industry-specific scheduling solutions with premium pricing
  • Integration with emerging AI tools for smarter meeting scheduling
  • International expansion beyond current primary markets
Threats
  • Major calendar providers enhancing their native synchronization capabilities
  • Increasing API restrictions from platform owners
  • New entrants focusing on niche scheduling use cases
  • Growing data privacy regulations affecting calendar data access
SWOT-Based Strategic Directions
  • SO Strategy: Leverage existing scheduling expertise to develop AI-enhanced optimization solutions specifically designed for complex enterprise environments and hybrid work models, capitalizing on the growing demand while building on core strengths.
  • WO Strategy: Address limited brand recognition by creating industry-vertical solutions that showcase deeper value, partnering with established players in those verticals to accelerate market penetration.
  • ST Strategy: Mitigate dependency risks by developing proprietary value-adding layers on top of basic calendar functionality, making Cronofy valuable even if underlying calendar APIs change.
  • WT Strategy: Preemptively address potential API restrictions by deepening relationships with platform providers, potentially becoming an official partner rather than just an API consumer, while expanding beyond pure calendar functionality.

8. Conclusion and Insights

This section synthesizes our analysis to provide a comprehensive final assessment and key insights about Cronofy. We evaluate the soundness of the business model, competitive position in the market, and growth potential, while identifying major strengths and challenges, and providing a quantitative assessment through a SaaS scorecard.

8.1 Overall Assessment

Cronofy demonstrates a well-positioned SaaS business with significant potential, though it faces important challenges in a rapidly evolving market.

  • Business Model Soundness: Cronofy’s subscription-based API model provides sustainable recurring revenue with healthy margins. Their tiered pricing structure effectively captures value from different customer segments, from small startups to large enterprises. The developer-first approach creates technical lock-in, while the focus on solving complex calendar synchronization problems justifies premium pricing. However, dependency on third-party calendar systems creates some vulnerability in the business model.
  • Market Competitiveness: Cronofy has carved out a specialized position in the scheduling infrastructure space with strong technical differentiation. While larger tech platforms offer basic calendar functionality, Cronofy’s cross-platform capabilities and specialized features for complex scheduling scenarios give it a defendable market position. Their focus on security compliance and enterprise requirements further strengthens their competitive standing in business environments.
  • Growth Potential: Substantial growth opportunities exist through vertical specialization, geographical expansion, and feature development. As scheduling becomes increasingly important in distributed work environments, Cronofy is well-positioned to expand its footprint. The potential to create an intelligent scheduling layer that goes beyond basic synchronization offers significant upside in both customer acquisition and revenue per account.

Overall, Cronofy demonstrates the characteristics of a sustainable SaaS business with a clearly defined value proposition in a growing market. The company has successfully identified a technical pain point—complex calendar integration across systems—and built a scalable solution that addresses enterprise requirements. While the dependence on third-party platforms creates some vulnerability, Cronofy’s specialized expertise and focus on solving complex scheduling problems for businesses gives it a differentiated position that should be defensible in the mid-term. As remote and hybrid work models continue to evolve, the importance of sophisticated scheduling tools is likely to increase, providing tailwinds for Cronofy’s growth trajectory.

8.2 Key Insights

Our analysis of Cronofy reveals several critical insights that highlight its position and future prospects.

Major Strengths
  1. Technical excellence in solving the complex problem of cross-platform calendar synchronization, with robust handling of edge cases that challenge simpler solutions
  2. Strong security posture and compliance capabilities that satisfy enterprise requirements, creating a meaningful barrier to entry for competitors targeting business customers
  3. Developer-friendly approach with comprehensive documentation, SDKs, and support that facilitates adoption and creates technical lock-in
Key Challenges
  1. Dependency on major calendar platforms (Google, Microsoft, Apple) whose API policies could change, potentially undermining Cronofy’s value proposition
  2. Need to continuously innovate beyond basic synchronization to stay ahead of native calendar capabilities and justify premium pricing
  3. Balancing developer focus with the need to appeal to non-technical decision-makers who control budgets in enterprise environments
Core Differentiation

Cronofy’s most significant differentiation lies in its ability to abstract away the complexities of multiple calendar systems while providing enterprise-grade security and compliance. By offering a single, unified API that handles the intricacies of different calendar platforms, time zones, recurring events, and availability calculations, Cronofy enables developers to build sophisticated scheduling functionality without needing to become calendar synchronization experts. This technical abstraction layer, combined with robust security and compliance features, creates a compelling value proposition for businesses that need reliable, secure calendar integration but don’t want to invest in building and maintaining this infrastructure themselves.

8.3 SaaS Scorecard

A quantitative assessment on a 1-5 scale across key success factors provides a systematic evaluation of Cronofy’s overall competitiveness.

Assessment Criteria Score (1-5) Evaluation
Product Capability 4 Strong technical solution with comprehensive capabilities for calendar synchronization across platforms, though opportunities remain for more advanced intelligence and optimization features
Market Fit 4 Well-aligned with growing need for scheduling solutions in distributed work environments, addressing a clear pain point for developers and businesses
Competitive Positioning 3 Established differentiation in a specialized niche, though vulnerable to potential moves by major platforms that could diminish value proposition
Business Model 4 Sustainable subscription revenue model with tiered pricing that effectively captures value across customer segments, though some dependency risks exist
Growth Potential 4 Strong opportunities for expansion through vertical specialization, feature development, and geographical growth in an increasingly distributed work environment
Total Score 19/25 Good – A solid SaaS business with strong fundamentals and meaningful growth potential

With a total score of 19 out of 25, Cronofy demonstrates the characteristics of a successful specialized SaaS business. The company has developed a technically sophisticated solution to a persistent problem, created a sustainable business model around it, and positioned itself well in a growing market. While some vulnerabilities exist—particularly around platform dependencies and competitive pressures—the overall assessment indicates a strong foundation with significant growth potential. To reach excellence (22+ points), Cronofy would need to further develop its competitive moat through proprietary intelligence features, reduce platform dependency risks, and accelerate vertical specialization to strengthen its market position against both specialized competitors and platform owners.

9. Reference Sites

This section provides information about key websites related to Cronofy. It includes the official URL of the analyzed service, major competing or similar services, and useful resources that can be referenced when considering a similar business.

9.1 Analyzed Service

Cronofy’s official website and main resources.

9.2 Competing/Similar Services

Services that compete with or are similar to Cronofy in the calendar integration and scheduling space.

9.3 Reference Resources

Useful resources for building or understanding similar SaaS businesses in the scheduling and calendar integration space.

10. New Service Ideas

This section presents three promising SaaS business ideas based on our analysis of Cronofy. Each idea has been developed considering market needs and opportunities, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the analyzed service, and includes an actionable business model and differentiation strategy.

Idea 1: MeetingMesh

An AI-powered meeting optimization platform that intelligently organizes and schedules meetings across organizations to maximize productivity.
Overview

MeetingMesh goes beyond basic calendar synchronization to create an intelligent meeting optimization layer for organizations. Using AI and machine learning, it analyzes meeting patterns, participant behaviors, and productivity metrics to recommend optimal meeting schedules, formats, and participants. Rather than simply finding available time slots, MeetingMesh actively helps organizations reduce meeting overload, enhance meeting productivity, and create more balanced workdays through intelligent scheduling policies and automated optimization.

Who is the target customer?

▶ Medium to large enterprises struggling with meeting overload and calendar congestion
▶ Companies with distributed or hybrid teams working across multiple time zones
▶ Organizations focused on employee productivity and wellbeing initiatives
▶ Knowledge-intensive businesses where maximizing focused work time is critical

What is the core value proposition?

Too many organizations suffer from inefficient meeting cultures that drain productivity, with employees spending up to 30% of their time in unnecessary or poorly scheduled meetings. This leads to fragmented workdays, reduced deep work time, and increased employee burnout. MeetingMesh transforms meeting scheduling from a simple availability check to an intelligent optimization process that protects productivity. It automatically implements best practices like meeting-free days, focus time blocks, and intelligent grouping of meetings to create more balanced and productive calendars while still ensuring critical collaboration occurs.

How does the business model work?

• Core subscription: Per-user monthly fee with tiered pricing based on organization size and feature access, starting with basic optimization for small teams and scaling to enterprise-wide meeting intelligence
• Analytics upgrade: Premium tier offering deep insights into meeting patterns, productivity impacts, and optimization opportunities across the organization
• Consulting services: Implementation packages to help organizations establish and roll out effective meeting policies and optimization strategies alongside the software

What makes this idea different?

Unlike basic scheduling tools that simply find available times, MeetingMesh actively optimizes calendar patterns based on productivity science and organizational goals. While calendar blockers and scheduling assistants focus on individual preference, MeetingMesh provides organization-wide intelligence that balances individual needs with team collaboration requirements. Its algorithmic approach moves beyond manual policies to create continuously improving meeting cultures through data-driven optimization.

How can the business be implemented?
  1. Build core calendar integration using existing APIs (Google, Microsoft, etc.) with scheduling optimization algorithms on top
  2. Develop an AI engine that learns from meeting patterns and outcomes to improve scheduling recommendations
  3. Create an admin dashboard for setting organization-wide meeting policies and viewing analytics
  4. Integrate with productivity and collaboration tools to correlate meeting patterns with output metrics
  5. Establish partnerships with workplace consultants to create implementation packages combining software with policy guidance
What are the potential challenges?

• Behavioral change resistance: Organizations may struggle to adopt new meeting approaches even with clear productivity benefits – address through phased implementation and clear ROI measurement
• Calendar integration complexity: Managing changes across multiple systems while respecting user permissions requires sophisticated engineering – leverage existing platform APIs with careful security architecture
• AI recommendation quality: Early AI suggestions may not immediately demonstrate value – implement a feedback loop system to continuously improve algorithms based on user acceptance of recommendations


Idea 2: ScheduleChain

A blockchain-based scheduling protocol that enables trusted, verified availability sharing and appointment booking across organizational boundaries.
Overview

ScheduleChain creates a decentralized scheduling infrastructure that enables secure, verified appointment booking across organizational boundaries without exposing full calendar details. Using blockchain technology for verification and smart contracts for automation, it allows businesses and individuals to publish limited availability, book appointments with cryptographic verification, and establish scheduling relationships that maintain privacy while ensuring commitment integrity. The platform enables advanced scheduling use cases like verified sequential appointments, conditional scheduling, and programmable booking policies—all with immutable audit trails.

Who is the target customer?

▶ Professional services firms that schedule client appointments across organizational boundaries
▶ Healthcare providers requiring verifiable appointment chains with multiple specialists
▶ Supply chain and logistics companies coordinating sequential time slots
▶ High-security environments where scheduling verification is critical

What is the core value proposition?

Current scheduling systems fail when appointments need to span organizational boundaries with limited information sharing, verified sequences, or binding commitments. This creates significant friction in industries like healthcare (patient referrals), professional services (multi-party meetings), and supply chains (loading dock scheduling). ScheduleChain solves this by creating a trusted scheduling layer that maintains privacy while enabling verified booking. It automates complex scheduling patterns like conditional sequences where appointment B can only occur after verified completion of appointment A, creating reliable appointment chains without requiring full calendar visibility.

How does the business model work?

• Transaction-based model: Small fee per verified appointment booking, with volume discounts for enterprise users
• Network subscription: Monthly fee for organizations to join the ScheduleChain network with unlimited internal verifications and a quota of external transactions
• Smart contract templates: Premium fees for industry-specific scheduling contract templates that implement specialized booking logic

What makes this idea different?

ScheduleChain differs fundamentally from conventional scheduling tools by using blockchain technology to create verified, trustless scheduling that works across organizational boundaries. While conventional systems focus on finding mutual availability within closed systems, ScheduleChain enables programmable scheduling relationships between independent parties with cryptographic verification. Its decentralized approach allows organizations to participate in complex scheduling workflows without surrendering calendar control or exposing sensitive information.

How can the business be implemented?
  1. Develop the core blockchain protocol for availability publishing and appointment verification
  2. Create connector APIs to integrate with existing calendar systems (Google, Microsoft, etc.)
  3. Build SDKs for developers to incorporate verified scheduling into their applications
  4. Establish initial network through partnerships in key industries with complex scheduling needs
  5. Develop industry-specific smart contract templates for common scheduling workflows
What are the potential challenges?

• Blockchain adoption barriers: Many organizations have limited understanding of blockchain benefits – create simplified interfaces that hide complexity while delivering clear value
• Network effect dependency: Value increases with more participating organizations – focus initially on industry clusters where multi-party scheduling is common
• Integration with legacy systems: Many industries rely on outdated scheduling technologies – develop robust connectors and migration paths from traditional systems


Idea 3: TeamTempoAI

An AI workspace rhythm optimizer that uses calendar and activity data to suggest ideal work patterns tailored to team and individual productivity cycles.
Overview

TeamTempoAI analyzes individual and team productivity patterns to create personalized work rhythm recommendations that maximize both individual performance and team collaboration. By integrating with calendars, project management tools, and communication platforms, it identifies when each person does their best creative work, focused development, or collaborative activities. The system then generates optimal personal schedules, suggests ideal meeting times based on energy patterns rather than just availability, and helps teams align their collaborative windows while protecting individual peak performance periods.

Who is the target customer?

▶ Knowledge worker teams in creative, technical, and professional fields
▶ Organizations with flexible or hybrid work arrangements
▶ Companies focused on performance optimization and employee experience
▶ Managers of distributed teams seeking to improve collaboration effectiveness

What is the core value proposition?

The standard 9-5 workday with randomly distributed meetings ignores human performance biology and team dynamics, leading to suboptimal productivity and collaboration. Most people have distinct cognitive peaks and valleys throughout the day, but calendar tools treat all hours as equal. TeamTempoAI solves this by mapping individual performance patterns and team dynamics to create work schedules that align with natural productivity rhythms. It helps individuals protect their peak performance periods for critical work while scheduling meetings and collaboration during compatible team windows, resulting in better work quality, improved collaboration, and reduced burnout.

How does the business model work?

• Freemium individual model: Basic personal rhythm tracking and optimization free for individuals, with premium features available for upgrade
• Team subscription: Monthly per-user fee for team rhythm optimization, collaborative window identification, and manager insights
• Enterprise tier: Organization-wide implementation with advanced analytics, custom integrations, and performance optimization consulting

What makes this idea different?

Unlike traditional calendar tools that focus only on availability or basic preferences like “no meetings on Fridays,” TeamTempoAI uses AI to identify actual productivity patterns specific to each person and type of work. While most tools treat scheduling as a mechanical process of finding open slots, TeamTempoAI approaches it as a performance optimization challenge, using data to align work activities with biological and team rhythms. It goes beyond static preferences to create a learning system that continuously improves work patterns based on performance outcomes.

How can the business be implemented?
  1. Develop AI algorithms that identify productivity patterns from calendar data, application usage, and self-reported productivity scores
  2. Create integration with major calendar systems, project management tools, and communication platforms
  3. Build personal dashboard showing individual rhythm patterns and optimization recommendations
  4. Develop team visualization tools that identify collaborative windows compatible with individual peak times
  5. Implement continuous learning system that refines recommendations based on outcome feedback
What are the potential challenges?

• Data privacy concerns: Analyzing productivity patterns requires sensitive data access – implement strict privacy controls and transparent data usage policies
• Organizational culture barriers: Many companies resist flexible scheduling despite performance benefits – develop clear ROI measurements and gradual implementation approaches
• AI accuracy limitations: Early pattern recognition may not be immediately accurate for all users – incorporate user feedback mechanisms and implement progressive learning models that improve over time


Disclaimer & Notice

  • Information Validity: This report is based on publicly available information at the time of analysis. Please note that some information may become outdated or inaccurate over time due to changes in the service, market conditions, or business model.
  • Data Sources & Analysis Scope: The content of this report is prepared solely from publicly accessible sources, including official websites, press releases, blogs, user reviews, and industry reports. No confidential or internal data from the company has been used. In some cases, general characteristics of the SaaS industry may have been applied to supplement missing information.
  • No Investment or Business Solicitation: This report is not intended to solicit investment, business participation, or any commercial transaction. It is prepared exclusively for informational and educational purposes to help prospective entrepreneurs, early-stage founders, and startup practitioners understand the SaaS industry and business models.
  • Accuracy & Completeness: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information, there is no guarantee that all information is complete, correct, or up to date. The authors disclaim any liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from the use of this report.
  • Third-Party Rights: All trademarks, service marks, logos, and brand names mentioned in this report belong to their respective owners. This report is intended solely for informational purposes and does not infringe upon any third-party rights.
  • Restrictions on Redistribution: Unauthorized commercial use, reproduction, or redistribution of this report without prior written consent is prohibited. This report is intended for personal reference and educational purposes only.
  • Subjectivity of Analysis: The analysis and evaluations presented in this report may include subjective interpretations based on the available information and commonly used SaaS business analysis frameworks. Readers should treat this report as a reference only and conduct their own additional research and professional consultation when making business or investment decisions.

[/swpm_protected]

No comment yet, add your voice below!


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ready to get fresh SaaS ideas and strategies in your inbox?

Start your work with real SaaS stories,
clear strategies, and proven growth models—no fluff, just facts.